SAFES ARE BROKEN—HERE’S HOW TO FIX THEM

Nov 8 / Nacho Imery

Imagine closing a seed round with minimal dilution, scaling with a lean AI-powered team, and reaching profitability without raising a Series A. That’s the new “seed‑trapping” playbook founders are embracing. But there’s a problem: if your deal used a standard SAFE, your investors might never get equity—or liquidity.


The SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) revolutionized early-stage fundraising when Y Combinator launched it in 2013. It replaced debt-like convertible notes with a simpler, founder-friendly instrument. But the startup landscape has changed: the rise of capital-efficient growth, IPO droughts, and a new wave of bootstrapped-but-scalable ventures have revealed a blind spot in the traditional SAFE structure.

This blog takes you deeper: we’ll explore what a SAFE is, how it works, its origin story, the pros and cons for both founders and investors, and what red flags to watch out for when negotiating one. We’ll also look at how the SAFE needs to evolve—offering milestone-based triggers to support this new fundraising reality.

What Is a SAFE?

A SAFE is a legal contract where an investor gives money to a startup in exchange for the right to receive equity later—typically when the company raises capital in a priced round or is acquired via exit. It’s not a loan: there’s no maturity date or interest. Instead, it’s a simplified way for startups to raise capital without assigning a valuation upfront.

More than 88% of U.S. startups use SAFEs during their early funding rounds. Popularized by Y Combinator, the SAFE offers a clean, efficient alternative to convertible notes. More about SAVE explained in Wikipedia.

The Origin Story: Pre‑Money vs. Post‑Money SAFEs

Y Combinator introduced SAFEs in 2013 to simplify early-stage investing and remove the debt mechanics of convertible notes. The original version, known as the pre-money SAFE, left one big issue unresolved: founders and investors couldn’t clearly model ownership or dilution when multiple SAFEs were outstanding.

So, in 2018, YC introduced the post-money SAFE. This version calculates an investor’s equity stake after all SAFEs have been issued—offering clear, upfront visibility into ownership percentages. This makes ownership calculations precise and transparent: if you raise $1 million on a $10 million cap, it’s immediately clear that’s a 10% stake post-financing. Today, approximately 83–88% of SAFEs are post-money. 

With this update, investors could see exactly how much of the company they’d own post-conversion, and founders could better plan their cap tables.

How SAFEs Work: Mechanics at a Glance

SAFEs are triggered by:

- A priced equity financing (e.g., Series A)

- A liquidity event (e.g., acquisition or IPO)
 

They convert into preferred shares based on either:

- A valuation cap (maximum price at which the SAFE converts)
- A discount (e.g., 20% lower than the Series A price)
- Or a hybrid of both
 

Founders and investors can also add Most Favored Nation (MFN) clauses, which allow early SAFE holders to adopt better terms from future SAFEs.

What they lack in complexity, they make up for in flexibility—though sometimes at the cost of long-term alignment.

Pros and Cons of SAFEs

✅ Pros

 For Founders

- Faster and cheaper to close

- No debt or maturity pressure   

- Defers valuation until traction   

- Minimal legal costs upfront 

For Investors

- Early access to high-growth upside

- Discounted equity pricing 

- Standardized instrument 

- Often used by top accelerators (YC, Techstars) 


⚠️ Cons

For Founders

- Hard to model dilution with multiple SAFEs

- Risk of overhanging shadow equity

- Tax complexity on QSBS eligibility 

For Investors 

- Lack of investor protections (no pro-rata or voting)

- May never convert if no priced round or exit 

📘 See more on SAFE pros and cons: SeedLegals, Angel List

The Catch: Why SAFEs Can Backfire while "Uncle Sam" celebrates

As more startups grow efficiently without raising follow-on rounds—what my entrepreneur friend Ben Schwartz calls “seedstrapping”—investors are discovering that their SAFEs may never convert. With no priced round and no exit, SAFEs can remain in limbo, providing neither equity nor liquidity.


Here’s what most investors (and many founders) miss:


Dilution Mistery

Each SAFE represents “phantom equity” that converts later. Founders often underestimate dilution from multiple SAFEs, especially when each has different caps and discounts. Without a proper modeling tool, conversion day can be a cap table bloodbath.


No QSBS Clock Until Conversion

The coveted Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) exclusion under IRC §1202 can allow investors to exclude up to $10 million (or more) in capital gains—but only if they hold actual stock for five years.

👉 A SAFE is not stock, so the 5-year QSBS clock doesn’t start when the SAFE is signed. It only starts after the SAFE converts into preferred or common stock. If that never happens—or happens late—investors may lose a massive tax break.


No IRC §1244 Loss Protection

IRC §1244 allows early investors in startup stock to deduct losses as ordinary losses(up to $100,000 for joint filers). But again, this only applies to actual stockholders—not SAFE holders.

👉 If the startup fails and the SAFE never converts, the investor can’t claim this tax benefit. The loss may be treated as a capital loss, subject to strict limitations.


No Section 83(b) Election Possible

Unlike early stock purchasers or option holders, SAFE investors cannot file an 83(b) election to accelerate recognition of stock ownership. This makes their holding period dependent on conversion timing, not investment timing.


📌 In short: SAFEs offer economic upside without the tax upside—unless they convert. And in a seedstrapping world, where conversion may never happen, investors could find themselves stuck in a capital purgatory that’s not only illiquid—but also tax-inefficient.

Red Flags in SAFE Negotiations

Both founders and investors must scrutinize SAFEs beyond face value. Here are red flags I often see as trusted advisor of startups and investors:

🚩 For Founders


  1. Non-Transferability Clauses
    Prevent investors from selling their SAFEs on the secondary market—slowing liquidity.
  2. No Sunset Clause
    Without a deadline or conversion trigger, SAFEs may remain outstanding forever.
  3. Ambiguous Cap/Discount Language
    Vague math on how the cap or discount applies can cause serious disputes later.
  4. Side Letters with Hidden Terms
    Granting hidden board rights, vetoes, or warrants undermines transparency and fairness.
  5. Excessive Investor Control
    Unwarranted board seats, broad veto powers, or overreaching anti-dilution provisions. 


🚩 For Investors


  1. Lack of Standard Rights
    SAFEs often exclude pro-rata rights, information rights, or observer seats. These should be explicitly negotiated.
  2. Pre-money SAFE Traps
    Older SAFEs calculate ownership without factoring in all SAFEs issued—leading to surprise dilution at conversion.
  3. No Conversion Triggers
    If the company never raises again or exits, your investment may never convert. Milestone or date-based triggers can help.
  4. Unclear Liquidation Preferences Post-Conversion
    Without defined preferred share terms, conversion might lead to common stock, missing downside protection.
  5. Stacking Risk
    Multiple SAFEs issued at different caps/terms can create unexpected preference stacks, harming early investors. 


📌 Power Tip: Always request cap table modeling, review any parallel instruments (e.g., convertible notes), and understand how your SAFE fits into the broader fundraising strategy of the startup.

A Better Way: Milestone-Triggered SAFEs

My friend Ben Schwartz proposes a smart solution: milestone-based or date-based SAFE conversions.


Instead of waiting for a Series A or exit, the SAFE would convert when the startup reaches agreed metrics—like:

- $1M in Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)

- X% profit margin

- 10,000 active users

- EBITDA-positive for 12 months
 

📘 In uncapped SAFEs, the milestone would trigger a 409A valuation (a third-party, IRS-compliant valuation of common shares), and investors would convert at that price within 90 days.

📘 In capped SAFEs, conversion could occur at the valuation cap once the milestone hits.

This approach offers a win-win:

- Founders retain flexibility

- Investors gain a path to equity and liquidity—without relying on rare exits or future rounds
 

📌 Learn more:
What is a 409A valuation? (AngelList)

The Case for Reimagining SAFEs

Whether seedstrapping becomes a long-term trend or not, it’s clear that timelines to liquidity are stretching. VCs are under pressure. Founders want flexibility. But if early investors never get repaid, they’ll stop backing early-stage companies altogether.


If the SAFE is to remain a foundational fundraising tool, it must evolve—with built-in conversion protections that work across a range of startup outcomes.

Final Thoughts

Founders: the SAFE startup funding is a powerful tool—but you must understand its downstream impact. Don’t accept template terms blindly. Customize triggers. Protect your cap table.


Investors: demand transparency. Ask for milestones. Know your rights. If you don’t build protections into the SAFE, you may end up with neither equity nor exit.


🤝 Let's Work Together

If you’re a founder navigating early-stage fundraising, or an investor looking to structure your deals smartly, I can help. I’ve advised top startups, angels, and venture funds across the U.S. and Latin America on how to design clean, investor-ready capital structures that protect both sides and optimize long-term relationships and outcomes—including coordinating counsel to implement tax strategies like QSBS and 1244 planning.


✅ Need help negotiating a SAFE?

✅ Want to model dilution scenarios and investor returns?

✅ Unsure how to structure your next round or prepare for due diligence?


Let’s work together. I offer practical, founder-friendly, and investor-savvy trusted and strategic advisory services.


🔗 Thanks for reading! If you’re interested in more content about entrepreneurship, venture investing, or wealth planning, subscribe to my blog, listen to my podcast "Startups Mentoring & Venturing" where I interview in long format top players of the industry and visit 👉 nachoimery.com for free resources, strategic insights, and expert commentary.


Let’s build smarter deals together. 🚀

Created with